Men marching in masks, with guns

Couldn't agree more.

There is a similar situation in D39. There are rumors that Codey is going to back off supporting Ariyan because word is getting out that he is connected to the Arab-American anti-discrimination committee, which defends the PLO and terrorists. Ariyans law partner is Hani Khoury, the president of the ADC. Take a look at this website before you consider voting for this nut job:

Ariyans dictionary of terms:
http://www.adcnj.us/a_quick_reference_dictionary_sor.htm

Look at how they highlight PLO:
http://www.adcnj.us/Arab_Americans/arab_contributions_to_civilizati.htm

Answer me one question - Is everyone innocent until proven guilty?

Man, the boards are jumping!

Sorry, but Rileys poor pity me party is getting really old!

That clip shows her once again being a victim without any responsibility for her actions. Yes, her husband could easily explained to the judge his wife's political situation and move on. Now, they are trying to milk this all they can for the voters.

But, I just got off Red Jeresy and here is an even SCARIER link that was posted on there:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Fort_Dix_attack_plot

If you HAVE THE guts to read this link, it does go into painful detail on how these illegals carefully planned and plotted to blow us up. They go on to describe in detail their joy in killing innocent people and that "allah wll look out for their families once the damage has been done."

Now, sorry Ms Riley, but you cast the first stone trying to play off these poor people as defensless and downplay the seroiusness we are facing every day as a country!

Now for CONSTITUTION4ALL - have you been able to prove my last challenge to you about Diane Allen? See folks, this poster swore that Diane Allen said that she is against the bashing of poor little Tracy and she is angry at Haines,et al. That is an utter lie but of course, I am not going to get the truth, but it bears repeating!

Bottom line, Riley has had every opportunity to provide her own brand of homeland security information and what she will do to protect the residents and stand up for US AND NOT terrorists! She has been horribly muted on that.

More Cowbell Please !!

Go take your uninformed, unconstitutional, and communist rhetoric elsewhere! You cannot turn this one around on the voters. First of all, I read that link. Unlike you, and your GOP campaign people, that site uses the word "ALLEGEDLY" several times. My guess is because they know that to state something as fact without proof is unethical and illegal. You are such a moron.

Second, the guilt or innocence of those that have been accused is irrelevant to the conversation. Their guilt or innocence will be determined in a court of law after a trial upon evidence submitted by the government. The 8th district republicans are not in charge of convicting people.

Third, I take it you also do not know about appointments of federal public defenders. An attorney has to be placed on the list by the federal government, and that list is quite small and is made up of extremely experienced and ethical attorneys. Mr. Riley is one of those people who has a proven life of public service, first as a Marine and next as a prosecutor for the state of New Jersey for over 20 years. Once appointed you have to petition to be let out of the case. The federal government does not take appointments lightly and does not just let someone out because they ask for it. Your spouse running for office at the state level does not qualify.

I stated last week that I would be voting for Riley and Rudder, while abstaining from the Senate vote. Given what has occurred in the past week with this mailer I have changed my mind. No republican will be getting my vote.

You are still young Jason, and your inexperience running negative campaigns on the internet has shown throughout the past few months. You are hurting your cause, but lucky for those of us who support Ms. Riley, you are too dumb to see it.

Man you are really defensive! How do you know that gopgal is this Jason whatever??? More conspiracy theories?? Sorry but that link even though the word alledgely is thrown out there is not the point - these animals were on tape planning to blow our military base sky high! Unfortunately you are as clueless as they come; I too want to know constitution4all when did Senator Allen come out agaisnt the GOP in the 8th???? I read your post of that and you seem to be ignoring the CRAP YOU THROW OUT! And all your BS about judges etc is just BS! Riley could have very well recused himself without penalty and lawyers do it every day! The problem with your little Ms Riely is that she is trying to play herself off as the victim over and over and not take responsiblity for her actions and plays dumb when asked about her ideas for homeland security! Sorry dude, but you are way off base and that mailer with this link only reinforces why Riley is dangerous.

Jason is GOPGAL or not, my guess is no. However, I am sure that Jason is not the one responsible for that mailer. That responsibility rests squarely on the shoulders of Bill Layton, the Campaign Manager, and Chris Russell, the Executive Director. These self appointed political geniuses do not realize the damage they are doing to the candidacies of some very good people. Between the terrorist mailer and then the Braxton one, I only hope the work ethic and reputations of Haines, Stanfield and Donelly see them to victory in spite of the incompetency at Republican HQ.  One almost has to wonder if they are undermining their chances intentionally. I don't think so, I think they are just that dumb.

I will discuss the substance of the flier at a later time, but for your education Martin, Max Cleland did not lose his limbs while "fighting" in Vietnam. As someone who was involved to a degree in the Georgia Senate race, it was well known that Senator Cleland lost his limbs because of a grenade that he was playing with - some say he was showing off - exploded. It was not however brought up as an issue.

Constitution4all,
Thanks for the lesson on public defenders. Anyone that knows me will tell you I don't do the neg campaign thing. I am not GOPgal and I will assume you are calling Gopgal a moron and not me. You know who I am, man up and post your name if you want to call ppl names.

JRC

Please review my above post, I'm assuming you've never been privy to a Burlington County democratic campaign judging from you statement.

The Dems are running the most negative campaign in the history of Burlington County campaigns.

Then they cry foul when people criticize the Riley family for making money off defending an illegal alien accused of plotting to commit terrorists attacks.

They say it is "un-American" to accuse someone of a crime without a fair trial.

Yet, they do the same thing all day every day from day one of this campaign by declaring American citizen Sen. Martha Bark guilty of something she has never been charged with.

Choosing illegal immigrant's rights over Americans. Defending illegal immigrants accused of plotting to kill Americans.

And then, and this is the best part, having a double-dipping pension grabber who uses his office for personal gain as your "Reformer"

Yeah - these guys are going places. Have to admit, the money will get you closer than normal, but at the end of the day the 8th is a Republican Dist and the Dems are abusers of the system that side with illegal immigrants over and American.

Numero Uno - Not all of the people on this site are connected to the campaign. I am not. I have a job and a family and do not have the opportunity to read the posts every 5 minutes and answer questions demanded of me by some anonymous name on the internet. I am not afraid to respond to anything, it just might not be in the time period YOU feel is appropriate.

Numero Dos - stopdemcorruption, I think its funny you think I am Mr. Meyer or Ms. Riley. If I was, the party would be pretty pissed to hear that I am not supporting all of the ticket. I will NOT be voting for Bodine, I told you that. I will not be voting for Haines, because I think what he has done in this campaign is crap, and to put the blame on others and not take responsibility is spineless.

Numero Tres - I do not answer to you stopdemcorruption or anyone else. You can demand I answer questions all you like, but you are not in charge of me contrary to what you may believe.

Numero Quatro - That being said, I will be happy to respond to your Bark comparison. It is ludicrous to compare the two. Mailing out a flier with bunch of guys in ski masks with machine guns and implying that Ms. Riley supports terrorists is insane and does not compare to Martha Bark being under federal investigation. And Mr. Haines' response in the video on this site proves that he is embarrassed by the flier as well. Nevertheless, good ole Haines takes the cowardly approach and says it wasn't his decision to send out the flier and if it was his choice he would have done it differently. So when did Paulsen and Layton acquire all rights to Mr. Haines' name and photo? Haines had a choice to put his name and picture on that flier. He chose, either, not to stand up for what he believes in, or lied that he does not support the mailer. Either way, how is that the person we want in Trenton to defend our rights? This guy won't even stand up to his own party, what a joke!

Numero Cinco - HighTaxes, you want to know who I am? I will be happy to let you know as soon as everyone else on this site agrees to do the same. Talk about hiding behind a screename? All of the GOP supporters are doing the same thing with multiple names. Try gopgal and pablos3 and the rest hiding behind the computer and their slanderous remarks about Riley. You people are the hypocrites.

Unfortunately we will all have to sit back and wait for November 7 to arrive to see what the outcome will truly be. I can only hope that the voters will do the right thing and realize the type of smear campaign that has been run by the GOP. I have never seen anything so nasty in my life. That is not how you win elections. This one definitely backfired and they know it. All they can do is try to limit the damage, the problem is that they still have idiot supporters who aren't backing off the story. This is will bite you on the keister, mark my words.

History seems to prove the more affective the ad the more outraged the opposition. The proper angle to make would have been to tie the Fort Dix plot to the Democratic Party's lock step opposition to BOTH effective counter-terrorism programs which need to rely on surveillance AND to any real and substantial immigration reform. The latter would hinder the party's fundraising abilities (Clinton's asian worker donors as an example) as well as lower the potential number of improper absentee ballots needed to decide any close and contested election. It really isn't an issue what firm represents which group as much as Riley's adherence to a party more interested in fighting conservatism than terrorism is the issue.

Repubs have always been nastier, meaner and more offensive.

.