Brookdale Community College has canceled State Sen. Joseph M. Kyrillos’ cable television show, saying the college does not want to be at the flashpoint of a political campaign.
Kyrillos had hoped to show himself in conversation with U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie, an unabashed critic of state officials and arguably the GOP's favorite leading man. But the interview Kyrillos did with the feisty Christie may air after the Nov. 6th election, and not before, said Cheryl Cummings, executive director of the Brookdale Network, which produced the program.
"The program is not running," Cummings told PoliticsNJ.com. "It’s been produced, but it’s not running." She called a plug on Kyrillos’ website alerting viewers to the pre-election times and dates of his show "inaccurate information."
She said the initial green-light go ahead from a "lower level" production member at Brookdale was a "mistake."
Kyrillos, in Boston Monday for a Mitt Romney fundraiser, was disappointed.
"That’s their prerogative," said the five-term Republican senator from Monmouth County, on learning of the college’s decision not to air the show. Kyrillos’ interview with the corruption-busting Christie had been scheduled to run Tuesday evenings on Brookdale’s Channel 21, which operates under the umbrella of the cable network Comcast.
A Kyrillos press release noted that Channel 15, which is owned by Cablevision, is also scheduled to air "Tour of New Jersey," as is Comcast Channel 97.
"I still submitted it to the other channels," Kyrillos spokesperson Courtney A. Fagan said Monday of the roughly half-hour show featuring Kyrillos and Christie. The college, which receives taxpayer funds, pays the bulk of the production costs for Kyrillos’ show.
Cummings acknowledged that federal law requires broadcast entities to offer equal time to political candidates, but drew a distinction between public access and educational access. "Public access channels are open to the public," said Cummings. "What programs go on the channel (21) are determined by Brookdale, and they are educational programs."
Comcast spokesman Fred DeAndrea said the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allows windows of up to 60 days for candidates to run public access programing before a general election.
"Kyrillos is up for re-election," DeAndrea said. "He’s well within his rights to air the program before the election. ...When you’re talking about equal opportunity, it’s incumbent upon (an opposing) candidate to say that he wants equal time under the rules of the Federal Communications Commission."
But DeAndrea confirmed Cummings’ point when he added, "The college has its own rules to determine access." And Brookdale, Cummings insisted, does not want to get in the middle of the district 13 election.
The conventional wisdom is that Kyrillos is the favorite in his race against Democrat Leonard Inzerillo of Middletown, a firefighter who ran for the Assembly in 2003 and lost by 244 votes. A weekly repeated television appearance with the formidable Christie, a personal friend of Kyrillos’, would be radiant finishing gloss to the senator’s 2007 campaign.
"Kyrillos is trying to align himself with the forces of good government," said David Rebovich, executive director of the Institute for New Jersey Politics at Rider University. "Christie is the most popular Republican in New Jersey, and the gentlemanly Kyrillos has positioned himself as a meaningful Republican in a pivotal but changing area of the state."
Inzerillo said he likes his chances against Kyrillos given his earlier Assembly race showing.
"I like to believe there are those in the party who think I have a shot," the candidate added. "There are two teams on the ballfield and a lot of good, hard work to do."
Regarding Brookdale’s decision to yank Kyrillos’ show, Inzerillo said, "Did Brookdale agree to it initially under a misconception of why they were doing it? I don’t know the answer to that question."
Cummings said the policy was established in 2002, and underscored that the initial, pre-election scheduling of the show was simply "an oops."
In recent months, the outspoken Christie has appeared with state representatives in town forums as he’s provided information about crime fighting and good government and taken questions from citizens. He's also publicly called into question the leadership attributes of Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine and is widely viewed as a challenger to Corzine in 2009. This past spring, the U.S. attorney appeared at a Middletown event with Kyrillos, where the pair faced a crowd roused out of their chairs by Christie’s impassioned remarks about citizenship.
Addressing the Kyrillos-Christie effect, local Democrats complain that the U.S. Attorney has let it be known in at least one instance that he does not want his much coveted image used in connection with campaign literature.
"I know Christie warned the Mayor of Marlboro not to use his name, there was a letter to that effect stating that his name was not to be used in any publicity," said Victor Scudiery, chairman of the Monmouth County Democratic Party.
The letter in question, dated Jan. 22, 2007, was written by Christie to a concerned citizen who'd contacted the U.S. Attorney regarding Marlboro Mayor Robert Kleinberg, who'd invited Christie to a reorganization meeting and posed with him in pictures.
"If any photo shows up in any campaign material, I will put a stop to it immediately," Christie wrote back to the citizen.
Another member of the Star-Ledger buyout group has moved over to the partisan side: Diane Walsh, a veteran reporter who covered Middlesex County, ... >
It's hard to not be concerned these days. We've all witnessed frustration with our institutions before but I never remember anything of this ... >
Instead of borrowing trillions to waste on make-work governmental projects, stimulate the economy with tax cuts. >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
In December 2008, the Holy See released a new document dealing with bioethics called “Dignitas Personae.” This “instruction” from the ... >
Hard to believe we have arrived at the last year of the first decade of the 21st century. Boy, seems like it was just yesterday that Bush was handed ... >
It's actually come to this: A panel convened by the legislature of the State of New Jersey has concluded that discrimination is not good. Maybe ... >
As it tends to, history seems to be repeating itself as 240 laid-off workers at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago revive a decades old tactic -- ... >
Many columnists write a "year in review" or a "predictions" piece for the New Year, however I decided to refrain from going down ... >
Five Democrat governors including New Jersey’s Jon Corzine and New York’s David Paterson have called upon the incoming Obama administration to ... >
complete bull
Oh man the Chris Christie is partisan crybabies must have gotten to her. This is just sad. Seriously how many people would have actually watched the show? How dare Kryillos have a TV show and have Christie on as a guest. I doubt that in the show they would have said "All the Democrats are corrupt, vote Republican".
God I hate this state.
backwardsjersey
Let me pull a page out of the Republican handbook and tell you that if you don't like New Jersey... GET OUT!
Which One was the Candidate?
I'm having trouble these days discerning when Chris Christie is acting as a nonpartisan U.S. attorney versus as a partisan hack for the state Republican Party; this includes his incredibly partisan attack on Dems last week for senatorial courtesy (despite Republicans using the same motion earlier in the year), his appearance at Republican candidate forums, his raising of 100k for Bush-Cheney in 2000, and his lack of recent arrests of Republicans in the state.
Perhaps it wasn't Kyrillos who was getting too much air time on the program: Perhaps instead it was candidate Christie, who is invoking politics and partisanship within the supposedly nonpartisan U.S. attorney's office in N.J.
MartinOne
I agree that CC has used his position as a launching pad for a future candidacy. One would have to be brain dead not to see that.
On your comment about him only going after democrats, what he has done is primarily indite democrats, which seems completely logical. Think about it. If you and I combined our discretionary income and decided to take our collective fortune of around $57.75 and bribe someone to get something done or undone in the state of New Jersey do you think there would be any Republicans in the top ten nominees? If we tried to bribe a congressman the odds favor it being a Democrat, if it was a US Senator or the Governor it would be a Democrat, and then there's the huge number of Democrat appointee's the Governor and state legislature gets to make.
What I'm saying is that if we put all the elected officials and appointee's in NJ in a room and arbitrarily shot ten of them (PC qualification: shot with a paint ball gun and only so that we could catch and release our potential bribee's) would you think it odd that we tagged nine democrats?
Codey said it best ...
No less an authority than Richard J. Codey attributed the Dem-heavy proportions of Christie's indictments to the simple fact that there are more Dems in positions of power in NJ. Codey more than validates Qwerty's paintball theory of prosecutorial activism. And yes, Christie is running for Governor, just as Democrat lawman Eliot Spitzer did in NY following a long series of very public prosecutions of some of Wall Street's finest moneychangers. In the case of Spitzer, he had the moxie to hold fundraising events sponsored by that very same cabal of financiers concurrent with his prosecutorial endeavors. I wonder if Christie will hit up Treffinger, Lynch or Kushner for campaign $$$ ...
Governor Christie
Martin, New Jersey would only be so lucky to have Chris run for governor, which he almost deifnately is anyway. Tell us something we didn't know. And while you and your fellow blue jersey cry babies call him partisan, I wonder how many people has he indicted were proved innocent? Oh that's right zero. What do you have to say about the overwhelming evidence against Coniglio now? Well if it weren't for your favorite US Attorney, Joe the Rug and Wayne Bryant would still be doing what they do best, stealing all our money. Heck, Coniglio may even get replaced by his own party cause they know he's guilty as sin.
Look at the Evidence
Backwards et al: I too want Christie to go after the bad guys (Lynch, Bryant, Treffinger, and more), so don't confuse the matter. I respectfully submit that you are wrong in your claim that Christie is nonpartisan and ask that you and any other interested Republican read the following articles and evidence on Christie and his partisan actions; the blog is partisan, but the evidence for the partisan assertion for Christie is from news sites. Qwerty's paintball analogy is accurate to an extent but only to an extent.
Exhibit #1: Christie, an objective U.S. attorney, swears in Republican politicians and tells voters to get rid of those in power (Democrats) http://www.bluejersey.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4586
Exhibit #2: Christie, a nonpartisan U.S. attorney, issues subpoenas to Dems in an election year over Christmas tree items. Number of subpoenas to Republicans who did the same when controlling the Assembly and Senate: 0 Significant quote from same article: “In 15 months, that's one conviction, two subpoenas to party organizations during an investigation of the Democratic leadership, and a letter clearing a Republican Mayor. During the same time period, there have been 63 investigations, subpoenas, indictments or convictions of Democrats. [view in Google Docs] That sounds bad, but there are all of 12 convictions with well over half of those involving John Lynch and Charles Kushner.” http://www.bluejersey.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4529
Exhibit #3: Number of Republicans vs. Number of Dems investigated by non-partisan Christie since 2002: “The result is that 75 percent of the people investigated are Democrats, and 21 percent are Republicans.” http://www.bluejersey.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4424
Exhibit #4: Christie, a nonpartisan U.S. attorney, goes on tour at Republican-sponsored forums (Baroni, Kryillos, etc.) http://www.bluejersey.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4573
Exhibit #5: Christie and his family's many contributions to the Bush campaign and the possible pay-back from said contributions. http://www.bluejersey.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4414
bluejersey?
Come on, News from the Wall Street Journey and gossip from the New York Post's Page Six. No pinkjersey although from your picture, you would particularly attractive in pink. (Don't go postal, it's just a joke)
not seen in Martin's response...
Anything about the latest Dem going down in flames thanks to Christie...Coniglio. Typical Martin style almost all the time, go after Christie without taking a look at the positive results.
Do I think Christie is partisan? Sure, he is a Republican you know. But anybody with a brain will tell you he's doing more good for this state than has ever been done before.
What's wrong about getting rid of dirty Trenton politicians. Yes he's handed out a number of subpoena's..but it's going to take a while to indict them all. He doesn't move on indicting until he's 100% sure he will win.
In terms of evidence ...
... in a court of law, Codey's opinion as arguably the foremost political expert in the state (my apologies to Dave Rebovich, LOL) would carry more weight than an ill-framed raw statistical argument. Codey is the ultimate witness, not to mention a straightshooter, and his testimony is unimpeachable. The truth is that counties such as Essex, Hudson and Camden are notorious for illicit activity and dominated by one party (with the notable exception of Treffinger). Add to that the fact that McGreevey headed what amounted to a racketeering organization (can you say Machiavelli) for several years, and you have your explanation as to the preponderance of Dems having been investigated/indicted. Do Republicans commit crimes? Sure. But when you're cleaning house, you start in the dirtiest places.
This is what happens
when you have an inept party leadership no one fears, and the other side with competent party leadership everyone fears.